This site now acts as an archive only. For the latest news, opinion, blogs and listings on disability arts and culture visit

Disability Arts Online

Colin Hambrook gives an overview of Liz Crow's Bedding In Bedding Out. / 16 July 2013

In April 2013 Crow produced Bedding Out as a 48 hour durational performance for the 'People Like You' exhibition at Salisbury Arts Centre. Having piloted the installation piece (as a DAO Diverse Perspectives commission) at the SPILL Festival held in Ipswich Art School Gallery in November 2012, Crow had time to consider how to up the level of engagement created in response to the live art installation. Through a livestream the performance was watched in over 50 countries; had a continuous twitter feed comprising of thousands of messages, with extra twitter conversations laid on to cope with demand.

In a bold statement the artist placed herself in a large bed located on the altar stage of the converted church in front of a beautiful stained glass backdrop. Each day, members of the public were invited to Bedside Conversations, gathering round the bed or perching upon it to talk about the work and its politics. One of the purposes of the piece was for the artist to illustrate the contradictions of the private and public self of disabled people - having to put on their best 'performance' for employers and funders, whilst having to present themselves at their worst for benefits assessments. Crow said of the work: "This is not a work of tragedy, but of in/visibility and complication; a chance to perform my self without façade."

When you consider the media frenzy of newspaper reports and television documentaries since the recession, focussing on fraud and ‘dependency culture’, often presenting grossly inaccurate statistics or highlighting individual stories as representative of a 'bigger picture' then the need Bedding Out addresses for showing the complexities of the lives of disabled people becomes more pertinent.

In the conversations that arose through social media, compiled by Liz Crow (Roaring Girl Productions), Nick Dilworth (My Legal Forum) and Dawn Willis, the anger, disenfranchisement and resolve of disabled people comes to the fore. Something extraordinary unfolds as facts about living on benefits and stories of disabled peoples' lives as they really are and what it is to be a benefit claimant, come into focus showing why it matters so much to speak out.

The edited tweets from the twitter conversations will soon be available as a resource. You can currently find the conversations that transpired from the last Bedding Out on

What strikes me fundamentally from the material accrued by Liz Crow is how much of an attitude of total disregard for the lives of the poor by the wealthy and powerful, at its height during Victorian times, has resurfaced. How can a country that places itself above others as an example of a civilised society tolerate the authorities making demands that people prepare for work, whilst they are in the throes of dying. This has been the reality for at least 1,300 sick or disabled people, who have died (over what period) shortly after having their benefits stopped. What a terrible indictment of the cruelty of the administrative systems set up to assess work capability and what an ignominious disregard for human life.

Coming a year after the Paralympics, with all its hero, can-do rhetoric, we are seeing the full extent of how the sports agenda has been subverted and manipulated to demonise disabled people, who have been turned into a contemporary folk-devil as part of an ideological drive to divide and rule. The scrapping of the Independent Living Fund, due to close in 2015 is the next hangman's drop waiting to descend on disabled people...

Keywords: cuts to services,live art


Keith Denby

24 July 2013

I see that 'welfare reform' in an of itself is a dishonest strategy. The bottom line is we have a benefits system that assumes that everyone who comes to it asking for help is trying it on in order to take money for nothing. The system is dedicated to finding every device, including obfuscation, bullying and refusal to communicate decisions, to deny your 'entitlement' through the application process. There have been times when I've given up trying for benefits when I've been out of work and impairment issues have got the better of me. The bullying and intimidation tactics employed by agency staff have led me to despair. Luckily I've been able to get employment before hitting the breadline.

It's clear from the vast numbers using food banks that more and more people are hitting the breadline every day. The fact that many of the reported 170,000 a day using these services currently are actually in work is evidence of the numbers of people alienated by the benefits system. It would be interesting to see the figures for how much the benefits system costs the taxpayer and how much the system actually gives out in benefits of all kinds. I wouldn't be surprised to see that the administration costs much more than the amount actually handed out.

If politicians were honest they would clearly propose that they were committed to doing away with the benefits system altogether (which is what is happening under the mantle of welfare reform) and society would have a chance to decide whether or not we think that leaving those in need of support out in the cold, literally and metaphorically, is a good idea or not? As things are we are being denied the chance of having any democratic input into whether or not, through the tax system, we want to look after peoples' needs or leave them to die.